Lawyer: Amit Kumar Srivastava





Legal Type: Lawyer
Law Firm Size: Individual Practice
Established: A/A0581/2012
Profile Rating:
Client Rating: 1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 StarsLoading...
Client Reviews:
No client reviews

Location(s): Allahabad
Address: 82/60, South Malaka,Allahabad
Email: amit.aulaw@gmail.com
Phone: +919450604192
Website:
Provides free consultation? No. Consultation is paid.


About Amit Kumar Srivastava, Lawyer

Amit Kumar Srivastava is a Lawyer located in Allahabad. This Lawyer has profile rating of “” and has “
No client reviews
” verified client reviews. The client rating of this Lawyer in Allahabad is 1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 StarsLoading.... Address of this Lawyer is 82/60, South Malaka,Allahabad . The Lawyer can be contacted on phone: +919450604192. Whether this Lawyer provides any free consultaion? No. Consultation is paid. Amit Kumar Srivastava has established law practice in Administrative Law, Alternative Dispute Resolution, Banking and Finance, Business Law, Civil and Revenue, Consumer Law, Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Employment Law, Family Law, Human Rights, Immigration Law, Intellectual Property Rights, NRI Law, Property Law, Tax. Amit Kumar Srivastava practices in Supreme Court of India, High Court, District Courts, Forums and Tribunals.

More information

Information not provided




Practice Areas

  • Administrative Law
  • Alternative Dispute Resolution
  • Banking and Finance
  • Business Law
  • Civil and Revenue
  • Consumer Law
  • Constitutional Law
  • Criminal Law
  • Employment Law
  • Family Law
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration Law
  • Intellectual Property Rights
  • NRI Law
  • Property Law
  • Tax


Courts

  • Supreme Court of India
  • High Court
  • District Courts
  • Forums and Tribunals



Client Reviews: 0



No client has reviewed this lawyer

Write a review for Amit Kumar Srivastava, Lawyer


Use the form below to leave a review
  • Review without all case or consultation details will not be approved. Review must mention the case number, case title and court in which case is (or was) pending. In case of consultation, provide details about consultation.
  • Reviewer must himself be party to the case whose details are mentioned in review. In case of consultation, reviewer must have taken consultation himself.