Lawyer: Bikramjit Singh Randhawa





Legal Type: Lawyer
Law Firm Size: Individual Practice
Established: P/2421/2006
Profile Rating: Not Eligible
Client Rating: 1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 StarsLoading...
Client Reviews:
No client reviews

Location(s): Chandigarh
Address: House no.3314, Banker enclave, sector 50 D, Chandigarh
Email: RANDHAWABIKRAM52@YAHOO.COM
Phone: +919855833888
Website:
Provides free consultation? Yes. Free initial consultation for 10 minutes.


About Bikramjit Singh Randhawa, Lawyer

Bikramjit Singh Randhawa is a Lawyer located in Chandigarh. This Lawyer has profile rating of “Not Eligible” and has “
No client reviews
” verified client reviews. The client rating of this Lawyer in Chandigarh is 1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 StarsLoading.... Address of this Lawyer is House no.3314, Banker enclave, sector 50 D, Chandigarh. The Lawyer can be contacted on phone: +919855833888. Whether this Lawyer provides any free consultaion? Yes. Free initial consultation for 10 minutes. Bikramjit Singh Randhawa has established law practice in Alternative Dispute Resolution, Civil and Revenue, Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Employment Law, Family Law, Human Rights, Immigration Law, NRI Law, Property Law. Bikramjit Singh Randhawa practices in High Court, District Courts.

More information

Information not provided




Practice Areas

  • Alternative Dispute Resolution
  • Civil and Revenue
  • Constitutional Law
  • Criminal Law
  • Employment Law
  • Family Law
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration Law
  • NRI Law
  • Property Law


Courts

  • High Court
  • District Courts



Client Reviews: 0



No client has reviewed this lawyer

Write a review for Bikramjit Singh Randhawa, Lawyer


Use the form below to leave a review
  • Review without all case or consultation details will not be approved. Review must mention the case number, case title and court in which case is (or was) pending. In case of consultation, provide details about consultation.
  • Reviewer must himself be party to the case whose details are mentioned in review. In case of consultation, reviewer must have taken consultation himself.