Lawyer: Mayank Dev Singh





Legal Type: Lawyer
Law Firm Size: Individual Practice
Established: P/2718/2017
Profile Rating: Not Eligible
Client Rating: 1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 StarsLoading...
Client Reviews:
No client reviews

Location(s): Chandigarh
Address: House No 1654 Sector-9, Urban Estate, Karnal, Haryana House no 590 Sector-6, Panchkula
Email: mayankdevsingh1@gmail.com
Phone: +919999664284
Website:
Provides free consultation? Yes. Free initial consultation for 10 minutes.


About Mayank Dev Singh, Lawyer

Mayank Dev Singh is a Lawyer located in Chandigarh. This Lawyer has profile rating of “Not Eligible” and has “
No client reviews
” verified client reviews. The client rating of this Lawyer in Chandigarh is 1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 StarsLoading.... Address of this Lawyer is House No 1654 Sector-9, Urban Estate, Karnal, Haryana House no 590 Sector-6, Panchkula. The Lawyer can be contacted on phone: +919999664284. Whether this Lawyer provides any free consultaion? Yes. Free initial consultation for 10 minutes. Mayank Dev Singh has established law practice in Alternative Dispute Resolution, Consumer Law, Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Employment Law, Family Law, Immigration Law. Mayank Dev Singh practices in Supreme Court of India, High Court, District Courts, Forums and Tribunals.

More information

Practicing at Punjab and Haryana High Court, State Consumer Forums, various Tribunals & other District Courts dealing in criminal, accidental, matrimonial, arbitration and consumer matters.




Practice Areas

  • Alternative Dispute Resolution
  • Consumer Law
  • Constitutional Law
  • Criminal Law
  • Employment Law
  • Family Law
  • Immigration Law


Courts

  • Supreme Court of India
  • High Court
  • District Courts
  • Forums and Tribunals



Client Reviews: 0



No client has reviewed this lawyer

Write a review for Mayank Dev Singh, Lawyer


Use the form below to leave a review
  • Review without all case or consultation details will not be approved. Review must mention the case number, case title and court in which case is (or was) pending. In case of consultation, provide details about consultation.
  • Reviewer must himself be party to the case whose details are mentioned in review. In case of consultation, reviewer must have taken consultation himself.