Lawyer: Anshuman Mandhar





Legal Type: Lawyer
Law Firm Size: Individual Practice
Established: P/1551/2005
Profile Rating: Not Eligible
Client Rating: 1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 StarsLoading...
Client Reviews:
No client reviews

Location(s): Chandigarh
Address: H.no 130A, Hem Vihar, Phase 1, Baltana zirakpur mohali pb
Email: mandharanshuman@yahoo.in
Phone: +919872820731
Website:
Provides free consultation? No. Consultation is paid.


About Anshuman Mandhar, Lawyer

Anshuman Mandhar is a Lawyer located in Chandigarh. This Lawyer has profile rating of “Not Eligible” and has “
No client reviews
” verified client reviews. The client rating of this Lawyer in Chandigarh is 1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 StarsLoading.... Address of this Lawyer is H.no 130A, Hem Vihar, Phase 1, Baltana zirakpur mohali pb. The Lawyer can be contacted on phone: +919872820731. Whether this Lawyer provides any free consultaion? No. Consultation is paid. Anshuman Mandhar has established law practice in Administrative Law, Alternative Dispute Resolution, Banking and Finance, Business Law, Civil and Revenue, Consumer Law, Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Employment Law, Family Law, Human Rights, Immigration Law, Intellectual Property Rights, NRI Law, Property Law, Tax. Anshuman Mandhar practices in High Court, District Courts, Forums and Tribunals.

More information

Information not provided




Practice Areas

  • Administrative Law
  • Alternative Dispute Resolution
  • Banking and Finance
  • Business Law
  • Civil and Revenue
  • Consumer Law
  • Constitutional Law
  • Criminal Law
  • Employment Law
  • Family Law
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration Law
  • Intellectual Property Rights
  • NRI Law
  • Property Law
  • Tax


Courts

  • High Court
  • District Courts
  • Forums and Tribunals



Client Reviews: 0



No client has reviewed this lawyer

Write a review for Anshuman Mandhar, Lawyer


Use the form below to leave a review
  • Review without all case or consultation details will not be approved. Review must mention the case number, case title and court in which case is (or was) pending. In case of consultation, provide details about consultation.
  • Reviewer must himself be party to the case whose details are mentioned in review. In case of consultation, reviewer must have taken consultation himself.