Lawyer: Mridul Goswami





Legal Type: Lawyer
Law Firm Size: Individual Practice
Established: R-1102-2013
Profile Rating:
Client Rating: 1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 StarsLoading...
Client Reviews:
No client reviews

Location(s): Jaipur
Address: Devriji Ka Mandir Johari Bazar Jaipur
Email: adv@mridulgoswami.com
Phone: +919602262292
Website:
Provides free consultation? Yes. Free initial consultation for 10 minutes.


About Mridul Goswami, Lawyer

Mridul Goswami is a Lawyer located in Jaipur. This Lawyer has profile rating of “” and has “
No client reviews
” verified client reviews. The client rating of this Lawyer in Jaipur is 1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 StarsLoading.... Address of this Lawyer is Devriji Ka Mandir Johari Bazar Jaipur . The Lawyer can be contacted on phone: +919602262292. Whether this Lawyer provides any free consultaion? Yes. Free initial consultation for 10 minutes. Mridul Goswami has established law practice in Administrative Law, Alternative Dispute Resolution, Banking and Finance, Business Law, Civil and Revenue, Consumer Law, Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Employment Law, Family Law, Human Rights, Immigration Law, Intellectual Property Rights, NRI Law, Property Law, Tax. Mridul Goswami practices in Supreme Court of India, High Court, District Courts, Forums and Tribunals.

More information

Information not provided




Practice Areas

  • Administrative Law
  • Alternative Dispute Resolution
  • Banking and Finance
  • Business Law
  • Civil and Revenue
  • Consumer Law
  • Constitutional Law
  • Criminal Law
  • Employment Law
  • Family Law
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration Law
  • Intellectual Property Rights
  • NRI Law
  • Property Law
  • Tax


Courts

  • Supreme Court of India
  • High Court
  • District Courts
  • Forums and Tribunals



Client Reviews: 0



No client has reviewed this lawyer

Write a review for Mridul Goswami, Lawyer


Use the form below to leave a review
  • Review without all case or consultation details will not be approved. Review must mention the case number, case title and court in which case is (or was) pending. In case of consultation, provide details about consultation.
  • Reviewer must himself be party to the case whose details are mentioned in review. In case of consultation, reviewer must have taken consultation himself.