Lawyer: Kewal Krishan Rajput

Legal Type: Lawyer
Law Firm Size: Individual Practice
Established: P/730/1979
Profile Rating:
Client Rating: 1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 StarsLoading...
Client Reviews:
No client reviews

Location(s): Jalandhar
Address: Kothi No. 153, Urban Estate Phase-II,
Phone: +919814145028
Provides free consultation? Yes. Free initial consultation for 5 minutes.

About Kewal Krishan Rajput, Lawyer

Kewal Krishan Rajput is a Lawyer located in Jalandhar. This Lawyer has profile rating of “” and has “
No client reviews
” verified client reviews. The client rating of this Lawyer in Jalandhar is 1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 StarsLoading.... Address of this Lawyer is Kothi No. 153, Urban Estate Phase-II, . The Lawyer can be contacted on phone: +919814145028. Whether this Lawyer provides any free consultaion? Yes. Free initial consultation for 5 minutes. Kewal Krishan Rajput has established law practice in Administrative Law, Alternative Dispute Resolution, Banking and Finance, Business Law, Civil and Revenue, Consumer Law, Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Employment Law, Family Law, Human Rights, Immigration Law, Intellectual Property Rights, NRI Law, Property Law, Tax. Kewal Krishan Rajput practices in Supreme Court of India, High Court, District Courts, Forums and Tribunals.

More information

Information not provided

Practice Areas

  • Administrative Law
  • Alternative Dispute Resolution
  • Banking and Finance
  • Business Law
  • Civil and Revenue
  • Consumer Law
  • Constitutional Law
  • Criminal Law
  • Employment Law
  • Family Law
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration Law
  • Intellectual Property Rights
  • NRI Law
  • Property Law
  • Tax


  • Supreme Court of India
  • High Court
  • District Courts
  • Forums and Tribunals

Client Reviews: 0

No client has reviewed this lawyer

Write a review for Kewal Krishan Rajput, Lawyer

Use the form below to leave a review
  • Review without all case or consultation details will not be approved. Review must mention the case number, case title and court in which case is (or was) pending. In case of consultation, provide details about consultation.
  • Reviewer must himself be party to the case whose details are mentioned in review. In case of consultation, reviewer must have taken consultation himself.