Lawyer: Raj Nath Singh





Legal Type: Lawyer
Law Firm Size: Individual Practice
Established: 30/12/2007
Profile Rating:
Client Rating: 1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 StarsLoading...
Client Reviews:
No client reviews

Location(s): Lucknow
Address: 58 Napier Part-2 ThakurganjLucknow
Email: rajnath335@yahoo.com
Phone: +9109336418646
Website:
Provides free consultation? Yes. Free initial consultation for 5 minutes.


About Raj Nath Singh, Lawyer

Raj Nath Singh is a Lawyer located in Lucknow. This Lawyer has profile rating of “” and has “
No client reviews
” verified client reviews. The client rating of this Lawyer in Lucknow is 1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 StarsLoading.... Address of this Lawyer is 58 Napier Part-2 ThakurganjLucknow. The Lawyer can be contacted on phone: +9109336418646. Whether this Lawyer provides any free consultaion? Yes. Free initial consultation for 5 minutes. Raj Nath Singh has established law practice in Administrative Law, Alternative Dispute Resolution, Banking and Finance, Business Law, Civil and Revenue, Consumer Law, Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Employment Law, Family Law, Human Rights, Immigration Law, Intellectual Property Rights, NRI Law, Property Law, Tax. Raj Nath Singh practices in Supreme Court of India, High Court, District Courts, Forums and Tribunals.

More information

Information not provided




Practice Areas

  • Administrative Law
  • Alternative Dispute Resolution
  • Banking and Finance
  • Business Law
  • Civil and Revenue
  • Consumer Law
  • Constitutional Law
  • Criminal Law
  • Employment Law
  • Family Law
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration Law
  • Intellectual Property Rights
  • NRI Law
  • Property Law
  • Tax


Courts

  • Supreme Court of India
  • High Court
  • District Courts
  • Forums and Tribunals



Client Reviews: 0



No client has reviewed this lawyer

Write a review for Raj Nath Singh, Lawyer


Use the form below to leave a review
  • Review without all case or consultation details will not be approved. Review must mention the case number, case title and court in which case is (or was) pending. In case of consultation, provide details about consultation.
  • Reviewer must himself be party to the case whose details are mentioned in review. In case of consultation, reviewer must have taken consultation himself.