Lawyer: Sanjeev kumar behl

Legal Type: Lawyer
Law Firm Size: Individual Practice
Established: D/181/2000
Profile Rating:
Client Rating: 1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 StarsLoading...
Client Reviews:
No client reviews

Location(s): New Delhi
Address: "16/20, ist floor, subhash nagar new delhi-110027"
Phone: +919810182003
Provides free consultation? No. Consultation is paid.

About Sanjeev kumar behl, Lawyer

Sanjeev kumar behl is a Lawyer located in New Delhi. This Lawyer has profile rating of “” and has “
No client reviews
” verified client reviews. The client rating of this Lawyer in New Delhi is 1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 StarsLoading.... Address of this Lawyer is "16/20, ist floor, subhash nagar new delhi-110027". The Lawyer can be contacted on phone: +919810182003. Whether this Lawyer provides any free consultaion? No. Consultation is paid. Sanjeev kumar behl has established law practice in Administrative Law, Alternative Dispute Resolution, Banking and Finance, Business Law, Civil and Revenue, Consumer Law, Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Employment Law, Family Law, Human Rights, Immigration Law, Intellectual Property Rights, NRI Law, Property Law, Tax. Sanjeev kumar behl practices in Supreme Court of India, High Court, District Courts, Forums and Tribunals.

More information

Information not provided

Practice Areas

  • Administrative Law
  • Alternative Dispute Resolution
  • Banking and Finance
  • Business Law
  • Civil and Revenue
  • Consumer Law
  • Constitutional Law
  • Criminal Law
  • Employment Law
  • Family Law
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration Law
  • Intellectual Property Rights
  • NRI Law
  • Property Law
  • Tax


  • Supreme Court of India
  • High Court
  • District Courts
  • Forums and Tribunals

Client Reviews: 0

No client has reviewed this lawyer

Write a review for Sanjeev kumar behl, Lawyer

Use the form below to leave a review
  • Review without all case or consultation details will not be approved. Review must mention the case number, case title and court in which case is (or was) pending. In case of consultation, provide details about consultation.
  • Reviewer must himself be party to the case whose details are mentioned in review. In case of consultation, reviewer must have taken consultation himself.