Lawyer: Naresh kumar beniwal

Legal Type: Lawyer
Law Firm Size: Individual Practice
Established: D/791/1988
Profile Rating:
Client Rating: 1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 StarsLoading...
Client Reviews:
No client reviews

Location(s): New Delhi
Address: "Ch.No-350 (western wing.), Tis hazari courts, delhi-110054"
Phone: +919868116540
Provides free consultation? No. Consultation is paid.

About Naresh kumar beniwal, Lawyer

Naresh kumar beniwal is a Lawyer located in New Delhi. This Lawyer has profile rating of “” and has “
No client reviews
” verified client reviews. The client rating of this Lawyer in New Delhi is 1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 StarsLoading.... Address of this Lawyer is "Ch.No-350 (western wing.), Tis hazari courts, delhi-110054". The Lawyer can be contacted on phone: +919868116540. Whether this Lawyer provides any free consultaion? No. Consultation is paid. Naresh kumar beniwal has established law practice in Administrative Law, Alternative Dispute Resolution, Banking and Finance, Business Law, Civil and Revenue, Consumer Law, Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Employment Law, Family Law, Human Rights, Immigration Law, Intellectual Property Rights, NRI Law, Property Law, Tax. Naresh kumar beniwal practices in Supreme Court of India, High Court, District Courts, Forums and Tribunals.

More information

Information not provided

Practice Areas

  • Administrative Law
  • Alternative Dispute Resolution
  • Banking and Finance
  • Business Law
  • Civil and Revenue
  • Consumer Law
  • Constitutional Law
  • Criminal Law
  • Employment Law
  • Family Law
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration Law
  • Intellectual Property Rights
  • NRI Law
  • Property Law
  • Tax


  • Supreme Court of India
  • High Court
  • District Courts
  • Forums and Tribunals

Client Reviews: 0

No client has reviewed this lawyer

Write a review for Naresh kumar beniwal, Lawyer

Use the form below to leave a review
  • Review without all case or consultation details will not be approved. Review must mention the case number, case title and court in which case is (or was) pending. In case of consultation, provide details about consultation.
  • Reviewer must himself be party to the case whose details are mentioned in review. In case of consultation, reviewer must have taken consultation himself.